Andrew: Popularity, Rank and History

By the Baby Name Data Editorial Team · Last updated: October 2026

Andrew has been recorded in U.S. Social Security Administration baby name data in 145 of the 145 years covered by this site, first appearing in 1880 and most recently in 2024. Across that whole span, parents recorded 1,329,846 births with this name, split between 4,953 girls and 1,324,893 boys. Because the larger side of that split is boys, this page follows the boys ranking table as its main story, while still reporting the combined total above so the name can be compared fairly with every other name in the top 100 all-time list. Every figure here is a direct count from the SSA file: there are no estimates, no projections, and no names added from any other source.

The single biggest year for Andrew was 1987, when 36,205 boys received the name and it reached rank 6 nationally. A name's peak year matters because it shows the moment when the name competed most successfully against every other name chosen that year. Rank and count tell slightly different stories: the count can rise simply because more babies were born overall, while the rank and the share of births strip out that effect. In 1987, Andrew accounted for 1.94% of all recorded boys births, which is the cleanest measure of how dominant it was at its height compared with peaks reached in smaller or larger birth years.

Andrew by decade

The decade table below is where the long story of Andrew becomes easiest to read. A decade total smooths out single-year spikes and shows whether a name was a brief fashion or a durable fixture. Names that hold high decade totals for forty or fifty years behave very differently from names that post one enormous decade and then fade, and Andrew can be placed on that spectrum directly from these ten-year sums and the best rank it managed inside each decade.

During the 1880s, Andrew stayed inside the top 100 for boys, with a best rank of 24 and 6,053 births recorded over the ten years, a solid and visible presence without quite reaching the very top of the table. During the 1890s, Andrew stayed inside the top 100 for boys, with a best rank of 32 and 5,719 births recorded over the ten years, a solid and visible presence without quite reaching the very top of the table. During the 1900s, Andrew stayed inside the top 100 for boys, with a best rank of 37 and 6,277 births recorded over the ten years, a solid and visible presence without quite reaching the very top of the table. During the 1910s, Andrew stayed inside the top 100 for boys, with a best rank of 42 and 28,152 births recorded over the ten years, a solid and visible presence without quite reaching the very top of the table. During the 1920s, Andrew stayed inside the top 100 for boys, with a best rank of 49 and 35,952 births recorded over the ten years, a solid and visible presence without quite reaching the very top of the table. During the 1930s, Andrew stayed inside the top 100 for boys, with a best rank of 62 and 25,025 births recorded over the ten years, a solid and visible presence without quite reaching the very top of the table. During the 1940s, Andrew stayed inside the top 100 for boys, with a best rank of 75 and 34,618 births recorded over the ten years, a solid and visible presence without quite reaching the very top of the table. During the 1950s, Andrew stayed inside the top 100 for boys, with a best rank of 55 and 60,970 births recorded over the ten years, a solid and visible presence without quite reaching the very top of the table.

During the 1960s, Andrew stayed inside the top 100 for boys, with a best rank of 33 and 97,112 births recorded over the ten years, a solid and visible presence without quite reaching the very top of the table. During the 1970s, Andrew stayed inside the top 100 for boys, with a best rank of 20 and 132,943 births recorded over the ten years, a solid and visible presence without quite reaching the very top of the table. In the 1980s, Andrew was a top-ten name for boys, reaching as high as rank 5 and recording 285,094 births across the decade, one of its strongest ten-year stretches in the entire file. In the 1990s, Andrew was a top-ten name for boys, reaching as high as rank 5 and recording 272,929 births across the decade, one of its strongest ten-year stretches in the entire file. In the 2000s, Andrew was a top-ten name for boys, reaching as high as rank 5 and recording 202,577 births across the decade, one of its strongest ten-year stretches in the entire file. During the 2010s, Andrew stayed inside the top 100 for boys, with a best rank of 14 and 105,056 births recorded over the ten years, a solid and visible presence without quite reaching the very top of the table. During the 2020s, Andrew stayed inside the top 100 for boys, with a best rank of 52 and 26,416 births recorded over the ten years, a solid and visible presence without quite reaching the very top of the table.

Rank history in selected years

This table samples the record at intervals so the shape of the history is visible at a glance: the birth count, the national rank among boys, and the share of all boys births for that year. Shares are included deliberately. In the 1880 file the recorded birth population is far smaller than in the peak birth years of the twentieth century, so a modest count in 1880 can represent a larger share, and a larger rank, than the same count would earn today. Reading count, rank, and share together is the method this site recommends on every page, and it is explained in full on the methodology page linked in the footer.

Recent years and the other side of the table

Between 2010 and 2024 the annual count moved from 14,268 to 4,772, a change of -66.6 percent, which is the clearest short-hand for where Andrew stands right now: losing ground in the most recent data. In 2000, for comparison, Andrew recorded 23,657 births for boys, and in 2010 it recorded 14,268. Placing 2024 between those two reference points shows whether the latest figure is part of a steady climb, a steady slide, or a plateau after earlier movement. None of these short windows should be read on their own: a name recovering from a low base can post large percentage gains while still ranking modestly, and a name easing down from a peak can lose percentage points while remaining one of the most used names in the country.

Andrew also appears on the girls side of the file, with 4,953 recorded births between 1880 and 2024. That secondary use is much smaller than the 1,324,893 births recorded for boys, and SSA ranks each sex separately, so the rank history above follows the boys table only. Counting both sides together, Andrew totals 1,329,846 recorded births, which is the figure that places it at number 25 on this site's all-time combined list. Readers comparing names should keep the two sides separate, because a rank earned among boys and a rank earned among girls describe two different fields of competing names in the same year.

To explore further, compare Andrew with the full rankings for its peak year (1987) through the years index, browse the decade rankings, or return to the complete A–Z list of name pages. The state pages show how the biggest states ranked names in 2024, which often differs from the national order in the smaller details even when the same few names lead both tables.

Frequently asked questions

How many babies named Andrew were born in 2024?
In 2024 the SSA recorded 4,772 boys named Andrew, ranked 68 among boys that year.

When was Andrew most popular?
Andrew peaked in 1987 with 36,205 births for boys, reaching rank 6 that year in SSA records.

How many people named Andrew appear in SSA records since 1880?
SSA records show 1,329,846 births named Andrew from 1880 through 2024, counting both sexes together.

Disclaimer: Baby Name Data publishes statistics drawn from U.S. Social Security Administration baby name records. Figures are counts of Social Security card applications by year of birth and are shown for general information only. Counts below five in any year, sex, or state are not released by the SSA and are not estimated here. Nothing on this page is advice about what to name a child.

Data: U.S. Social Security Administration baby name records, 1880–2024, retrieved October 2026. Source: ssa.gov/oact/babynames/